gaykerop.blogg.se - Install firebug on firefox

INSTALL FIREBUG ON FIREFOX HOW TO
INSTALL FIREBUG ON FIREFOX INSTALL
INSTALL FIREBUG ON FIREFOX UPGRADE

Take away my ability to choose and you just drive me further into the hands of Goog and Apple.

INSTALL FIREBUG ON FIREFOX HOW TO

I had all my key add ons disabled with the update to 43 and had to figure out how to flip the bit to ignore this. Please consider keeping your security feature optional for those who don’t want/need it. It makes sense for me to use this preference and I would have to ditch firefox if I couldn’t anymore. I get enforcing signed addons by default, but removing the preference for it in the future is a step which is obviously taking control away from the user. NetExport has been replaced with a signed “Har Export Trigger” Some are very annoying being disabled as I do need them daily 😛 No, the SDK will also be phased out, and we will try to migrate extensions from the SDK to WebExtensions with as little effort from the developer as possible.ĭojo Firebug Extension 1.1.5b2 ĭownload Statusbar 0.9.10.1-signed Will Addon-SDK get enough support as WebExtension API in the future even after XUL/XPCOM is deprecated?

CPOWs are a hack to keep some add-ons working after the move to e10s, but you shouldn’t rely on them.Īnd one more question, for extension development what kind of role will Addon-SDK play in the future? coz we will have WebExtension API as the first choice. Not all low-level APIs are affected by e10s, but some will break and the SDK isn’t getting much development support at the moment. The API is planned to be stable and be released officially early next year.Ģ. What’s the future of Addon-SDK,? I see low-level API will be affected by multi-process Firefox, does this mean low-level API cannot work well in the future even though we have CPOW as a special choice now?ġ. So when will Mozilla provide an stable WebExtension API for development?Ģ. I want to use WebExtension API because this is the preferred way in the future but I’m afraid that this is still in early stage and cannot provide enough functionality as Google Chrome. Also I see there are two alternatives, Addon-SDK extension and WebExtension API. Hi, now I have one legacy XUL-ovelay extension and I know this will be obsolete in the future. I’m afraid the bug is the best source of information (for all of us). There haven’t been any status updates, except that it is expected to ship on time. Will you please point me to some decent sources pertaining to this? I haven’t been able to find any information on the status or location or even news on an undranded build except for a (vague) bug listing. I think the current estimate is to release e10s with Firefox 45. What’s the current timeline on enabling e10s in a release? Tags: compatibility, developers, documentation, firefox 43, signingĬategories: compatibility, developers, documentation 20 responses

INSTALL FIREBUG ON FIREFOX UPGRADE

The automatic compatibility validation and upgrade for add-ons on AMO will happen in the coming weeks, so keep an eye on your email if you have an add-on listed on our site with its compatibility set to Firefox 42. If your add-on breaks on Firefox 43, I’d like to know. Please let me know in the comments if there’s anything missing or incorrect on these lists. There’s a preference that turns signing enforcement off ( in about:config), but the current plan is to drop the preference in Firefox 44.

INSTALL FIREBUG ON FIREFOX INSTALL

Unsigned add-ons won’t install and will be disabled by default.

This is the first version of Firefox that will enforce signing.

However, these changes should only break compatibility if you are interacting with these components on a binary level.

A security fix made some changes to the following interfaces: nsIDocShell, nsIDocShellLoadInfo, nsISHEntry.

This makes changes in nsIQuotaManager and nsIUsageCallback.

Use origin attribute in nsIUsageCallback.

Give the canvas documentation a look for possible alternatives.

This was a non-standard, internal use function, but a few add-ons used it.

Remove nsIDOMHTMLCanvasElement::MozFetchAsStream().

Paraphrasing: any content loaded into a webpage needs to have contentaccessible=yes, no matter how it is loaded, which means that add-ons loading XBL into content will probably need to add it. Comment 64 explains what this has to do with add-ons.

Use channel->ascynOpen2 dom/xbl/nsXBLService.cpp.

There is more information available in Firefox 43 for Developers, so you should also give it a look. Here’s the list of changes that went into this version that can affect add-on compatibility. Firefox 43 will be released on December 15th.